Reproduce each source total independently before comparing systems. Roll the opening position through additions, applications, releases, reversals, transfers, refunds, credits, corrections, and the closing position. Tie the result to the operating report, subledger, general ledger, and bank activity as applicable. A net agreement can conceal equal and opposite errors.
Use clear statuses such as ready to match, matched, timing item, missing evidence, amount mismatch, duplicate risk, policy question, awaiting approval, disputed, and closed with evidence. Every open item needs an owner, due date, quantified value, and focused question. Keep its original age when carrying it forward.
A concrete example
Payroll totals $1.8 million. The audit export assigns $140,000 to a higher-risk code, while approved assignments support only $108,000. The workpaper isolates the $32,000 coding population without deciding insurance classification.
First reproduce each system’s arithmetic. Then compare its result with the approved agreement or procedure. Finally show the ledger effect. Write the exception as an observed fact: one source reports a value, another reports a different value, and the difference is quantified. Possible causes belong in a separate note until evidence confirms them.
Set escalation thresholds under company policy, but do not rely on dollars alone. A small repeated error, an approaching deadline, an access concern, altered payment details, or a missing approval can require immediate attention. A modest item open for months may expose a broken handoff.